Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/121910
Titel: Research with cancer registry data in radiation oncology : current possibilities and perspectives
Autor(en): Müller, Jörg AndreasIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Bedir, AhmedIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Katalinic, AlexanderIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Oesterling, Florian
Graw, Aleksandra
Kluttig, AlexanderIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Corradini, StefanieIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Vordermark, DirkIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Medenwald, DanielIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Erscheinungsdatum: 2026
Art: Artikel
Sprache: Englisch
Zusammenfassung: Clinical background Cancer registry data are an essential resource for population-based oncology research and quality assurance in Germany. With the revision of the Federal Cancer Registry Data Act in 2021, for the first time, a legal basis was created for the development of a nationwide clinical cancer dataset. This registry offers new opportunities for research, particularly in radiation oncology. Objective This review aims to provide an overview of the current possibilities of and challenges to using German cancer registry data in radiation oncology, with a focus on data structure, missing data, access procedures, and methodological aspects for scientific research. Methods We examined legal frameworks, data access procedures, and the structure of the nationwide basic oncology dataset (oBDS), particularly the components relevant to radiotherapy (RT). The completeness and comprehensiveness of RT data across federal states were assessed using national registry data from the German Center for Cancer Registry Data (ZfKD) for the years 2020–2022. Results The cancer registries provide structured data on RT through the oBDS, including treatment intent, technique, target area, and side effects. However, significant variability in terms of completeness and reporting standards persists among federal states. Missing data rates remain high in some regions, particularly for key RT parameters such as treatment technique, the relationship to surgery, and boost application. Methodological challenges for scientific use include handling missing data, confounding, immortal time bias, and exposure misclassification. Conclusion Despite existing limitations, cancer registry data in Germany represent a valuable resource for real-world research in radiation oncology. They allow for large-scale population-based studies beyond the constraints of clinical trials. With improved data harmonization, methodological rigor, and future data linkages (e.g., to health insurance data), registry-based studies can contribute significantly to evidence-based decision-making and quality improvement in radiation oncology.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/123859
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/121910
Open-Access: Open-Access-Publikation
Nutzungslizenz: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International
Journal Titel: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
Verlag: Springer Medizin
Verlagsort: Berlin
Band: 202
Originalveröffentlichung: 10.1007/s00066-025-02486-w
Seitenanfang: 13
Seitenende: 22
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
s00066-025-02486-w.pdf301.18 kBAdobe PDFMiniaturbild
Öffnen/Anzeigen