Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/122690
Titel: Electrical vestibular co-stimulation by lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays
Autor(en): Fröhlich, LauraIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Mollet, Julia K.
Salha, Ahmeda
Eichhorn, Klaus W.G.
Curthoys, Ian StewartIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Dlugaiczyk, JuliaIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Farr, LuiseIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Strieth, SebastianIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Erscheinungsdatum: 2026
Art: Artikel
Sprache: Englisch
Zusammenfassung: Cochlear Implants Electrical Vestibular Co-stimulation by Lateral Wall Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays Fröhlich, Lauraa,*; Mollet, Julia K.a; Salha, Ahmeda; Eichhorn, Klaus W.G.a; Curthoys, Ianb; Dlugaiczyk, Juliac; Wagner, Luised; Strieth, Sebastiana Author Information Otology & Neurotology 47(3):p 493-501, March 2026. | DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004813 Open SDC Hypothesis and background: The objective of this study was to analyze cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials to electrical stimulation (e-cVEMPs and e-oVEMPs) by straight lateral wall cochlear implant electrodes with respect to response numbers, amplitudes, latencies, and thresholds. Methods: E-VEMPs were recorded in adult Synchrony cochlear implant (CI) patients stimulating with electric pulse trains. The stimulation electrode was successively varied between apical stimulation at electrode E3, medial stimulation at E6, and basal stimulation at E10 and E11. VEMPs to bone conducted vibration (BCV) were recorded as a reference in all participants. Results: The study included 20 ears (cases) of 19 patients (mean age of 54.8 y, SD: 11.3 y). E-VEMPs could be measured in 18 cases (95%), and VEMPs to BCV were elicited in 12 cases (60%). Response rates to basal stimulation at E10 and E11 were higher compared with medial and apical stimulation. The difference was significant for e-cVEMPs. For basal stimulation, e-VEMP amplitudes were comparable to BCV-stimulated VEMPs and increased with increasing stimulation level. E-VEMP thresholds were within clinical fitting levels for basal stimulation electrodes and close to or below hearing thresholds for some participants. Conclusion: Vestibular co-stimulation by straight lateral wall electrodes was demonstrated by the presence of e-VEMPs in 95% of participants. Basal electrode contacts are more likely to lead to vestibular co-stimulation compared with medial and apical electrodes, and vestibular co-stimulation can occur before electric stimuli become audible. Vestibular co-stimulation can, therefore, occur during daily CI use, while the effect on everyday balance function is unknown yet.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/124635
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/122690
Open-Access: Open-Access-Publikation
Nutzungslizenz: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International
Journal Titel: Otology & neurotology
Verlag: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Verlagsort: Philadelphia, Pa.
Band: 47
Heft: 3
Originalveröffentlichung: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004813
Seitenanfang: 493
Seitenende: 501
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei GrößeFormat 
electrical_vestibular_co_stimulation_by_lateral.27.pdf2.58 MBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen