Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/103092
Titel: Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19 : a cross-sectional study
Autor(en): Lühnen, JuliaIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Frese, ThomasIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Mau, WilfriedIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Meyer, GabrieleIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Mikolajczyk, RafaelIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Richter, Matthias
Schildmann, JanIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Braunisch, Matthias ChristophIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Fichtner, FalkeIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Holzmann-Littig, Christopher Werner KarlIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Kranke, PeterIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Popp, Maria
Schaaf, Christian
Schmaderer, ChristophIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Seeber, Christian ManuelIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Werner, Anne
Wijnen‑Meijer, Marjo
Meerpohl, Jörg J.In der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Steckelberg, AnkeIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Erscheinungsdatum: 2023
Art: Artikel
Sprache: Englisch
Zusammenfassung: Background: Right from the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic the general public faced the challenge to find reliable and understandable information in the overwhelming flood of information. To enhance informed decision-making, evidence-based information should be provided. Aim was to explore the general public’s information needs and preferences on COVID-19 as well as the barriers to accessing evidence-based information. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study. Nine hundred twenty-seven panel members were invited to an online survey (12/2020-02/2021). The HeReCa-online-panel is installed at the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg to assess regularly the general public’s view on health issues in five regions in Germany. The survey was set up in LimeSurvey, with nine items, multiple-choice and open-ended questions that allowed to gather qualitative data. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and a content analysis was carried out to categorise the qualitative data. Results: Six hundred thirty-six panel members provided data; mean age 52 years, 56.2% female, and 64.9% with higher education qualifications. Asked about relevant topics related to COVID-19, most participants selected vaccination (63.8%), infection control (52%), and long-term effects (47.8%). The following 11 categories were derived from the qualitative analysis representing the topics of interest: vaccination, infection control, long-term effects, therapies, test methods, mental health, symptoms, structures for pandemic control, infrastructure in health care, research. Participants preferred traditional media (TV 70.6%; radio 58.5%; newspaper 32.7%) to social media, but also used the internet as sources of information, becoming aware of new information on websites (28.5%) or via email/newsletter (20.1%). The knowledge question (Which European country is most affected by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic?) was correctly answered by 7.5% of participants. The Robert Koch Institute (93.7%) and the World Health Organization (78%) were well known, while other organisations providing health information were rarely known (< 10%). Barriers to accessing trustworthy information were lack of time (30.7%), little experience (23.1%), uncertainty about how to get access (22.2%), complexity and difficulties in understanding (23.9%), and a lack of target group orientation (15,3%). Conclusions: There are extensive information needs regarding various aspects on COVID-19 among the general population. In addition, target-specific dissemination strategies are still needed to reach different groups.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/105045
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/103092
Open-Access: Open-Access-Publikation
Nutzungslizenz: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International
Journal Titel: BMC public health
Verlag: BioMed Central
Verlagsort: London
Band: 23
Originalveröffentlichung: 10.1186/s12889-023-15131-x
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
s12889-023-15131-x.pdf1.64 MBAdobe PDFMiniaturbild
Öffnen/Anzeigen