Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/103092
Title: Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19 : a cross-sectional study
Author(s): Lühnen, JuliaLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Frese, ThomasLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Mau, WilfriedLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Meyer, GabrieleLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Mikolajczyk, RafaelLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Richter, Matthias
Schildmann, JanLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Braunisch, Matthias ChristophLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Fichtner, FalkeLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Holzmann-Littig, Christopher Werner KarlLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Kranke, PeterLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Popp, Maria
Schaaf, Christian
Schmaderer, ChristophLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Seeber, Christian ManuelLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Werner, Anne
Wijnen‑Meijer, Marjo
Meerpohl, Jörg J.Look up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Steckelberg, AnkeLook up in the Integrated Authority File of the German National Library
Issue Date: 2023
Type: Article
Language: English
Abstract: Background: Right from the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic the general public faced the challenge to find reliable and understandable information in the overwhelming flood of information. To enhance informed decision-making, evidence-based information should be provided. Aim was to explore the general public’s information needs and preferences on COVID-19 as well as the barriers to accessing evidence-based information. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study. Nine hundred twenty-seven panel members were invited to an online survey (12/2020-02/2021). The HeReCa-online-panel is installed at the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg to assess regularly the general public’s view on health issues in five regions in Germany. The survey was set up in LimeSurvey, with nine items, multiple-choice and open-ended questions that allowed to gather qualitative data. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and a content analysis was carried out to categorise the qualitative data. Results: Six hundred thirty-six panel members provided data; mean age 52 years, 56.2% female, and 64.9% with higher education qualifications. Asked about relevant topics related to COVID-19, most participants selected vaccination (63.8%), infection control (52%), and long-term effects (47.8%). The following 11 categories were derived from the qualitative analysis representing the topics of interest: vaccination, infection control, long-term effects, therapies, test methods, mental health, symptoms, structures for pandemic control, infrastructure in health care, research. Participants preferred traditional media (TV 70.6%; radio 58.5%; newspaper 32.7%) to social media, but also used the internet as sources of information, becoming aware of new information on websites (28.5%) or via email/newsletter (20.1%). The knowledge question (Which European country is most affected by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic?) was correctly answered by 7.5% of participants. The Robert Koch Institute (93.7%) and the World Health Organization (78%) were well known, while other organisations providing health information were rarely known (< 10%). Barriers to accessing trustworthy information were lack of time (30.7%), little experience (23.1%), uncertainty about how to get access (22.2%), complexity and difficulties in understanding (23.9%), and a lack of target group orientation (15,3%). Conclusions: There are extensive information needs regarding various aspects on COVID-19 among the general population. In addition, target-specific dissemination strategies are still needed to reach different groups.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/105045
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/103092
Open Access: Open access publication
License: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Journal Title: BMC public health
Publisher: BioMed Central
Publisher Place: London
Volume: 23
Original Publication: 10.1186/s12889-023-15131-x
Appears in Collections:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12889-023-15131-x.pdf1.64 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open