Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117984
Title: | Guideline on positioning and early mobilisation in the critically ill by an expert panel |
Author(s): | Schaller, Stefan![]() Scheffenbichler, Flora Alina Thaddäa ![]() Bein, Thomas ![]() Blobner, Manfred ![]() Grunow, Julius ![]() Hamsen, Uwe ![]() Hermes, Carsten ![]() Kaltwasser, Arnold ![]() Nydahl, Peter ![]() Reißhauer, Anett ![]() Renzewitz, Leonie Siemon, Karsten ![]() Staudinger, Thomas Ullrich, Roman ![]() Weber-Carstens, Steffen ![]() Wrigge, Hermann Zergiebel, Dominik Coldewey, Sina ![]() |
Editors: | Lewald, Heidrun |
Issue Date: | 2024 |
Type: | Article |
Language: | English |
Abstract: | A scientific panel was created consisting of 23 interdisciplinary and interprofessional experts in intensive care medicine, physiotherapy, nursing care, surgery, rehabilitative medicine, and pneumology delegated from scientific societies together with a patient representative and a delegate from the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies who advised methodological implementation. The guideline was created according to the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF), based on The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II. The topics of (early) mobilisation, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, assist devices for mobilisation, and positioning, including prone positioning, were identified as areas to be addressed and assigned to specialist expert groups, taking conflicts of interest into account. The panel formulated PICO questions (addressing the population, intervention, comparison or control group as well as the resulting outcomes), conducted a systematic literature review with abstract screening and full-text analysis and created summary tables. This was followed by grading the evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence and a risk of bias assessment. The recommendations were finalized according to GRADE and voted using an online Delphi process followed by a final hybrid consensus conference. The German long version of the guideline was approved by the professional associations. For this English version an update of the systematic review was conducted until April 2024 and recommendation adapted based on new evidence in systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. In total, 46 recommendations were developed and research gaps addressed. |
URI: | https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/119944 http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117984 |
Open Access: | ![]() |
License: | ![]() |
Journal Title: | Intensive care medicine |
Publisher: | Springer |
Publisher Place: | Berlin |
Volume: | 50 |
Issue: | 8 |
Original Publication: | 10.1007/s00134-024-07532-2 |
Page Start: | 1211 |
Page End: | 1227 |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Publikationen der MLU |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
s00134-024-07532-2.pdf | 1.41 MB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |