Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117984
Titel: Guideline on positioning and early mobilisation in the critically ill by an expert panel
Autor(en): Schaller, StefanIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Scheffenbichler, Flora Alina ThaddäaIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Bein, ThomasIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Blobner, ManfredIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Grunow, JuliusIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Hamsen, UweIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Hermes, CarstenIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Kaltwasser, ArnoldIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Nydahl, PeterIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Reißhauer, AnettIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Renzewitz, Leonie
Siemon, KarstenIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Staudinger, Thomas
Ullrich, RomanIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Weber-Carstens, SteffenIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Wrigge, Hermann
Zergiebel, Dominik
Coldewey, SinaIn der Gemeinsamen Normdatei der DNB nachschlagen
Herausgeber: Lewald, Heidrun
Erscheinungsdatum: 2024
Art: Artikel
Sprache: Englisch
Zusammenfassung: A scientific panel was created consisting of 23 interdisciplinary and interprofessional experts in intensive care medicine, physiotherapy, nursing care, surgery, rehabilitative medicine, and pneumology delegated from scientific societies together with a patient representative and a delegate from the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies who advised methodological implementation. The guideline was created according to the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF), based on The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II. The topics of (early) mobilisation, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, assist devices for mobilisation, and positioning, including prone positioning, were identified as areas to be addressed and assigned to specialist expert groups, taking conflicts of interest into account. The panel formulated PICO questions (addressing the population, intervention, comparison or control group as well as the resulting outcomes), conducted a systematic literature review with abstract screening and full-text analysis and created summary tables. This was followed by grading the evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence and a risk of bias assessment. The recommendations were finalized according to GRADE and voted using an online Delphi process followed by a final hybrid consensus conference. The German long version of the guideline was approved by the professional associations. For this English version an update of the systematic review was conducted until April 2024 and recommendation adapted based on new evidence in systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. In total, 46 recommendations were developed and research gaps addressed.
URI: https://opendata.uni-halle.de//handle/1981185920/119944
http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/117984
Open-Access: Open-Access-Publikation
Nutzungslizenz: (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International(CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International
Journal Titel: Intensive care medicine
Verlag: Springer
Verlagsort: Berlin
Band: 50
Heft: 8
Originalveröffentlichung: 10.1007/s00134-024-07532-2
Seitenanfang: 1211
Seitenende: 1227
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Open Access Publikationen der MLU

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
s00134-024-07532-2.pdf1.41 MBAdobe PDFMiniaturbild
Öffnen/Anzeigen